J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 28(1): 145-158  https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm21047
Sex and Gender Differences in Overlap Syndrome of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder and Effect of Genetic Polymorphisms in South Korea: A Long-term Follow-up Study
Ju Yup Lee,1,2 Nayoung Kim,1,3* Ji Hyun Park,3 Jeong Eun Yu,1 Yun Jeong Song,1 Jung Won Yoon,1 and Dong Ho Lee1,3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoungnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea; and 3Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: Nayoung Kim, MD, PhD
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-787-7008, Fax: +82-31-787-4051, E-mail: nakim49@snu.ac.kr, nayoungkim49@empas.com
Received: February 23, 2021; Revised: October 2, 2021; Accepted: October 11, 2021; Published online: January 30, 2022
© The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. All rights reserved.

cc This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background/Aims
Overlap functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) is associated with more severe gastrointestinal symptoms and lower quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical features of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, their overlap in terms of sex and gender, and to assess the risk factors, including genetic polymorphisms.
Methods
A total of 494 FGIDs and 239 controls were prospectively enrolled between 2004 and 2020. FGIDs were diagnosed based on the Rome III criteria and symptoms were evaluated using a questionnaire. Follow-up questionnaires were conducted to determine the change of symptoms during the 75.8-month mean observation period. Risk factors including genetic polymorphisms in neurotransmitter receptor (SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR, GNB3, ADRA2A, CCKAR, and TRPV1) and cytokine (TNFA and IL10) genes.
Results
NERD was more prevalent in men, and functional dyspepsia in women. Overlap FGIDs (n = 239) were more prevalent than nonoverlap FGIDs (n = 255) in women (P = 0.019). Anxiety and depression scores were higher in the overlaps (P = 0.012 and P < 0.001, respectively). Symptoms were more frequent and severe in the overlap FGIDs than in the non-overlaps (P < 0.001). During followup, symptoms progressed more frequently in the overlap FGIDs, especially in patients with the L/S genotype of SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR and anxiety/depression.
Conclusions
Overlap FGID patients need attention given their association with anxiety/depression and more severe symptoms, especially in women. Genetic polymorphisms also may be associated with certain symptoms of overlap FGIDs.
Keywords: Dyspepsia; Female; Male; Irritable bowel syndrome; Polymorphism
Introduction

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), functional dyspepsia (FD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are representative functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) without clinically detectable anatomical abnormalities, but elicit chronic and recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms.1 Although these FGIDs may manifest alone, 2 or more overlapping cases are common and defined as an overlap syndrome.2 Locke et al3 found that 1-8% of the general population have reported 2 to 3 FGIDs, whereas Choung et al4 found that 17% of the general population have reported more than 1 FGID. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of IBS among FD patients was 37%, which was significantly higher than that among those without FD (7%).5 In addition, the prevalence of FD in patients with IBS was 29-87%.3,6,7

FGID patients have a higher proportion of overlap syndrome than patients with other types of disorders which are not FGID,8-10 suggesting that patients with overlap syndrome visit the hospital more frequently than those with FD or IBS alone. Patients with overlap syndrome also reported more frequent and severe GI symptoms, more severe depressive symptoms, and lower quality of life (QoL) than those with single FGID.11 In actual clinical practice, overlap FGID can be frequently encountered, and it is important to know the clinical course of overlap FGID because these patients have severe symptoms and are highly likely to be related to psychosocial factors without responding to conservative treatment. However, there have been only few studies on the overlap syndrome12-15 and on follow-up16,17; therefore, studies on the characteristics of patients with overlap syndrome and their associated risk factors are insufficient.

The various causes of FGIDs include changes in the motor and sensory nerves of the intestine, psycho-neurological factors, and changes in the immune system due to infection and allergy. Recently, gene polymorphisms affecting the pathogenesis of FGIDs in families or twins were discovered.18 Previously, we suggested that genetic polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter gene-linked long polymorphic region (SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR) and the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor (ADRA2A) 1291C>G polymorphism are pathological factors of IBS.19 We also identified SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR and the 945G>C polymorphism in transient receptor potential ion channel of the vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) among Korean FD patients, particularly those positive for Helicobacter pylori infection.20 In addition, 5-HTTLPR L/L has been found to be a risk factor for the co-occurrence of IBS with constipation and FD.21

Moreover, in NERD patients, sensitivity to stress often determines the expression of symptoms; thus, NERD has been classified as an FGID and hypothesized to have an etiology different from that of reflux esophagitis. NERD represents the more common phenotypic presentation of GERD and comprises of patients who have typical symptoms without any mucosal breaks at endoscopy. However, these patients are markedly heterogeneous from a pathophysiological point of view.22 These groups consist of patients with esophageal acid exposure (true NERD), normal esophageal acid exposure but a positive symptom association probability for acid reflux (acid hypersensitive esophagus), or with normal esophageal acid exposure and a negative symptom association probability for any type of reflux (functional heartburn).22,23 Recently, the Rome criteria (Rome IV) for functional esophageal disorders, in which acid hypersensitive esophagus and non-acid hypersensitive esophagus groups have been combined into a new category of reflux hypersensitivity (RH) that would appear to fit somewhere between NERD and functional heartburn, has been defined.23,24 NERD, FD, and IBS often develop together in siblings, especially in families that carry a common genetic polymorphism. However, as the diagnosis of FGID depends on the patient’s subjective symptoms rather than clinical objective findings, and its etiology is often complex, studies focusing on the genes mentioned above are few, and investigation of genes in combination is rare.

Based on this background information, we hypothesized that the symptoms in overlap FGIDs may be severe and more progressive, and polymorphisms in genes involved in neurotransmission and cytokines may contribute to this overlap in FGIDs compared with non-overlap FGIDs. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of overlap syndromes among NERD, FD, and IBS patients, to elucidate the differences in their characteristics and symptoms, and to determine their risk factors according to their sex and gender. In addition, we aim to analyze the effect of genetic polymorphisms and anxiety/depression on FGIDs depending on whether they are non-overlap or overlap over a long follow-up period.

Materials and Methods

Study Subjects

Korean subjects were prospectively enrolled at the gastroenterology outpatient clinic of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) between July 2004 and August 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: provision of consent to participate in the study, aged 18-80 years, and scheduled upper endoscopy procedure. Colonoscopy and abdominal imaging studies (eg, abdominal ultrasound or abdominopelvic computed tomography) were performed with upper endoscopy in the presence of clinical indications. Healthy control subjects and patients with FGID were collected as follows: subjects who underwent GI evaluations as a health check-up or for other problems based on a family history of gastric or colon cancer were categorized as healthy controls, whereas those who visited the GI clinic for the evaluation of upper or lower GI symptoms were classified as cases upon consenting to participate in this study. This classification of healthy controls and cases was finally revised in the analysis step of the questionnaire survey. Exclusion criteria were as follows: history of GI surgery except appendectomy, inflammatory bowel disease, any malignancy, or systemic diseases requiring chronic medication except for hypertension and diabetes mellitus; pregnant or lactating women; and patients with hepatic, biliary, or psychiatric disorders requiring medication. Subjects were excluded from the study if organic diseases were found during follow-up endoscopy. The Institutional Review Board of SNUBH approved this study (B-2006-616-128), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study protocol has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04712617).

Diagnostic Questionnaire of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Demographic Data

After enrollment, the subjects received GI endoscopy regularly and were requested to fill up the Korean Bowel Disease Questionnaire (K-BDQ)19,20 and gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire25-28 which included 7 reflux symptom such as heartburn, acid regurgitation, chest pain, hoarseness, globus sensation, cough, and epigastric soreness whenever they undertook GI endoscopy.

NERD was defined as a typical heartburn occurring at least once a week without visible esophageal mucosal break, detected using endoscopy.29 Subjects with minimal changes on endoscopy and with typical reflux symptoms were also classified as NERD.30 A Korean Rome III criteria-based questionnaire translated from the original K-BDQ containing questions on 56 GI-related symptoms, sociodemographic status, medical history, smoking, alcohol habits, marital status, educational level, and employment status was prepared and validated.19,20,31

FD was diagnosed based on at least 1 of the following symptoms: bothersome postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning.32 Absence of any structural diseases (including on upper endoscopy) that are likely to explain the symptoms was required. FD was categorized as postprandial distress syndrome, epigastric pain syndrome, or mixed subtype based on the Rome III criteria.32,33 Postprandial distress syndrome was defined as the presence of meal-induced dyspeptic symptoms such as postprandial fullness and early satiation. Epigastric pain syndrome was diagnosed based on the presence of epigastric pain or burning sensations.32,33

IBS was defined by recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort with at least 2 of the following characteristics: relief with defecation, onset associated with a change in frequency of stool, and onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool.34 IBS was subclassified into IBS with constipation, IBS with diarrhea, mixed IBS, or unsubtyped IBS, as described previously.21

Assessment of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptoms, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life

Representative GI symptoms were classified according to frequency and severity. Symptom severity was calculated by adding the severity scores (from 0 to 4: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; and 4, very severe) using the K-BDQ.35 Stool consistency based on the Bristol Stool Form Scale36 and number of bowel habits were also evaluated.

Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).37 They were subdivided into anxiety and depression subscales, both containing 7 items each. Each response is ranked on a scale from 0 to 3. A higher HADS score indicates that the subject is more depressive or anxious. A total score of 8 or more for each subscale indicates potential anxiety disorder or depression.38

Genotyping

Genomic DNA from blood samples was isolated using QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (QIAGEN Inc, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, as reported previously.19 To detect the presence of the long (L) or short (S) allele of the SLC6A4 gene (5-HTTLPR), polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay was performed on a Perkin Elmer real time PCR machine model 9600 (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) with the forward primer 5’-TCCTCCGCTTTGGCGCCTCTTCC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-TGGGGGTTGCAGGGGAGATCCTG-3’. The 469-bp fragment of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism was designated “S,” and the 512-bp fragment was designated “L.” The genotyping of the CCK1R intron-779T>C polymorphism was also performed using the PCR-RFLP assay with the forward primer 5’-CTGTTCACTTGAGGAGCTTTG-3’ and the reverse primer 5’-TTAGAAGCTGACCTCCAACATGG-3’. The PCR product was digested using PstI; the T allele yielded DNA fragments of 264/480 bp, whereas the C allele, 744 bp. The G-protein β3 (GNB3) 825C>T, ADRA2A−1291C>G, cholecystokinin receptor 1 (CCK1R) intron 779T>C, TRPV1 945G>C, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFA) 308 G>A, and interleukin (IL) 10 592C>A single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined using 5-exonuclease TaqMan genotyping assays on an ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).20,21 The predesigned primer and probe sets were ordered at http://www. appliedbiosystems.com (GNB3 825C>T assay ID number: C___2184734_10; ADRA2A−1291C>G assay ID number: C___7611979_10; TRPV1 945G>C assay ID number: C___1093688_20) and used according to their protocols. The genotyping results of SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR, GNB3 825C>T, ADRA2A−1291C>G, CCK1R intron 779T>C, TRPV1 945G>C, TNFA308 G>A, and IL10 592C>A were confirmed using direct sequencing, with the ABI version 3.1 Sequence Analysis software (Applied Biosystems).

Statistical Methods

Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation or standard error), geometric mean (95% CI), or percentage. Comparisons among 3 or more groups were performed using the chi-square test in categorical variables or analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni correction in continuous variables. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed to determine whether the symptom scores were different within a group and between groups at baseline, and at first and second follow-up time points. A post-hoc Tukey’s test was used to identify the group that showed a difference when ANOVA showed a significant interaction. Variables with P < 0.05 in univariate analyses or clinical importance were subjected to multivariate analyses. All statistical tests were 2-tailed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 21.0 statistical package (version 21.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Demographic and Baseline Characteristics

A total of 733 subjects participated in this study (Table 1). The mean age was 52.7 ± 13.1 years, and 430 (58.7%) subjects were women. A total of 494 subjects were diagnosed with NERD, FD, and/or IBS, including 14.7% NERD-FD, 2.9% NERD-IBS, 7.0% IBS-FD, and 8.0% NERD-FD-IBS 3 overlap; 239 subjects were identified as healthy controls (Fig. 1A). The prevalence of NERD was significantly higher in men, whereas that of FD was significantly higher in women (Fig. 1B). The age of occurrence in the NERD-FD-IBS group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05) (Table 1). The proportions of single, divorced, and widowed patients were significantly higher in the FD-IBS (P < 0.05) and NERD-FD-IBS (P < 0.05) groups than in the control group. Anxiety and depression (HADS) scores were also significantly higher in the NERD-FD-IBS group (P < 0.05) than those in the control group (Table 1).

Table 1 . Demographic and Baseline Characteristics

VariablesHealthy control(n = 239)NERD only
(n = 116)
FD only
(n = 90)
IBS only
(n = 49)
NERD-FD
(n = 108)
NERD-IBS
(n = 21)
FD-IBS
(n = 51)
NERD-FD-IBS
(n = 59)
Age (yr)55.1 ± 11.757.0 ± 12.252.5 ± 12.746.8 ± 15.2a51.3 ± 13.150.5 ± 10.750.9 ± 13.644.0 ± 13.2a
Women146 (61.1)44 (37.9)a68 (75.6)a20 (40.8)68 (63.0)11 (52.4)35 (68.8)38 (64.4)
Body mass index (kg/m2)23.4 ± 3.424.1 ± 3.122.2 ± 3.322.7 ± 2.922.7 ± 3.123.3 ± 2.822.6 ± 3.623.0 ± 3.4
Marriage
Single/divorced/widowed32 (13.7)15 (12.9)8 (8.9)6 (14.0)18 (16.7)2 (9.5)13 (25.5)a21 (35.6)a
Married201 (86.3)101 (87.1)82 (91.1)37 (86.0)90 (83.3)19 (90.5)38 (74.5)38 (64.4)
Education
Elementary/middle school34 (16.3)16 (17.6)13 (16.7)1 (2.9)13 (14.1)4 (20.0)9 (23.7)10 (19.2)
High school44 (21.2)25 (27.5)30 (38.5)4 (11.4)36 (39.2)4 (20.0)9 (23.7)14 (26.9)
University130 (62.5)50 (54.9)35 (44.9)30 (85.7)43 (46.7)12 (60.0)20 (52.6)28 (53.8)
Job
Employed109 (52.9)60 (67.4)31 (39.7)23 (65.7)46 (50.5)15 (75.0)24 (57.2)27 (54.0)
Unemployed22 (10.7)10 (11.3)6 (7.7)3 (8.6)7 (7.7)0 (0.0)3 (7.1)4 (8.0)
Housewives75 (36.4)19 (21.3)41 (52.6)9 (25.7)38 (41.8)5 (25.0)15 (35.7)19 (38.0)
Alcohol (> 35 g/wk)29 (12.4)21 (18.1)4 (4.4)6 (24.0)10 (9.3)1 (4.8)12 (23.5)9 (15.3)
Current smoker11 (4.7)19 (16.4)9 (10.0)6 (24.0)15 (13.9)3 (14.3)7 (13.7)10 (16.9)
Daily spicy food ingestion160 (77.7)73 (73.0)55 (69.6)27 (75.0)73 (75.3)15 (78.9)26 (65.0)40 (76.9)
Anxiety HADS score5.1 ± 3.54.6 ± 2.77.9 ± 5.66.0 ± 3.36.1 ± 3.66.7 ± 3.18.0 ± 3.69.0 ± 3.7b
Depression HADS score5.3 ± 3.55.3 ± 3.26.9 ± 2.96.0 ± 3.37.3 ± 3.49.7 ± 1.210.0 ± 3.610.2 ± 3.6a

aP < 0.05 compared to control.

bP < 0.05 compared to NERD only group and control.

NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; FD, functional dyspepsia; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).



Figure 1. Proportions of subjects with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) (A) and distribution of FGIDs according to sex (B). The prevalence of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) was significantly higher in men and that of functional dyspepsia (FD) was significantly higher in women. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome. *P < 0.001 compared with women NERD, #P < 0.001 compared with men FD. FGID (n = 494), NERD (n = 304), FD (n = 308), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (n = 180), and non-overlap FGIDs (n = 255), overlap FGIDs (n = 239).

Clinical Characteristics of Non-overlap and Overlap Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

The number of non-overlap and overlap FGID subjects was 255 and 239, respectively. The average age of the patients in the overlap FGID group was lower than that of the non-overlap group (P < 0.001). The percentage of women in the overlap FGID group was higher than that in the non-overlap FGID group (P = 0.019), and the percentages of single, divorced, and widowed patients were higher than those in the healthy controls (P = 0.018) and non-overlap FGID group (P = 0.002) (Table 2). Anxiety and depression scores were also higher in the overlap FGID group than in the healthy control and non-overlap FGID groups (P = 0.012 in anxiety score and P < 0.001, respectively). Anxiety and depression scores were higher in women in the FGID group (P = 0.007 for anxiety and P = 0.056 for depression) (Table 2).

Table 2 . Clinical Characteristics of Non-overlap and Overlap Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

VariablesHealthy control (a)(n = 239)Non-overlap FGID (b) (n = 255)Overlap FGID (c) (n = 239)P-valuePost-hoc
Age (yr)55.1 ± 11.753.5 ± 13.549.4 ± 13.3< 0.001a > b, a > c
Females146 (61.1)132 (51.8)152 (63.6)0.019a > b, b < c
Body mass index (kg/m2)23.4 ± 3.423.2 ± 3.222.8 ± 3.20.139
Marriage0.002a < c, b < c
Single/divorced/widowed32 (13.7)29 (11.6)54 (22.6)
Married201 (86.3)220 (88.4)185 (77.4)
Education0.125
Elementary/middle school34 (16.3)30 (14.7)59 (28.9)
High school44 (21.2)115 (56.4)35 (17.8)
University130 (62.5)63 (31.2)103 (51.0)
Job0.677
Employed109 (52.9)114 (56.4)19 (9.4)
Unemployed22 (10.7)69 (34.2)112 (55.2)
Housewives75 (36.4)14 (6.9)77 (37.9)
Alcohol (> 35 g/wk)29 (12.4)31 (13.4)32 (13.4)0.939
Current smoker11 (4.7)34 (14.7)35 (14.6)< 0.001a < b, a < c
Daily spicy food ingestion160 (77.7)155 (72.1)154 (74.0)0.413
Anxiety HADS score5.1 ± 3.55.2 ± 3.36.2 ± 3.70.012a < c, b < c
Men5.2 ± 3.05.1 ± 2.95.7 ± 2.90.614
Women5.0 ± 3.95.3 ± 4.28.3 ± 4.1a0.011a < c, b < c
Depression HADS score5.3 ± 3.55.5 ± 3.28.2 ± 3.6< 0.001a < c, b < c
Men4.9 ± 2.75.5 ± 3.27.4 ± 3.20.007a < c, b < c
Women5.7 ± 4.15.6 ± 3.39.2 ± 3.9b0.001a < c, b < c

aP = 0.007 compared to men.

bP = 0.056 compared to men.

FGID, functional gastrointestinal disorder; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or n (%).



Frequency and Severity of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Between Non-overlap and Overlap Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

All upper and lower GI symptoms were significantly more frequent in the overlap FGID group than in the non-overlap FGID group and healthy control group. The severity of upper GI symptoms was significantly higher in the overlap FGID group than in the non-overlap FGID group (P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 . Frequency and Severity of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Between Non-overlap and Overlap Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

VariablesHealthy control (a)(n = 239)Non-overlap FGID (b)(n = 255)Overlap FGID (c)(n = 239)P-valuePost-hoc
Upper GI symptoms frequency
Early satiation26 (11.2)51 (20.6)136 (57.1)< 0.001a < b < c
Postprandial fullness30 (12.9)83 (33.6)185 (77.4)< 0.001a < b < c
Epigastric pain/burning40 (17.3)88 (35.5)169 (71.3)< 0.001a < b < c
Bloating31 (13.7)65 (26.9)146 (63.2)< 0.001a < b < c
Nausea19 (8.3)31 (13.1)101 (43.2)< 0.001a < b < c
Vomiting7 (3.1)10 (4.2)37 (15.7)< 0.001a < b < c
Upper GI symptoms severity (5 Likert score [0-4])
Early satiation symptom severity0.0 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.1< 0.001a < b < c
Postprandial fullness symptom severity0.0 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.12.5 ± 0.1< 0.001a < b < c
Epigastric pain symptom severity0.3 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.12.2 ± 0.1< 0.001a < b < c
Bloating pain symptom severity0.3 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.12.0 ± 0.1< 0.001a < b < c
Lower GI symptoms frequency
Less than 3 bowel movements/wk18 (8.0)21 (8.8)23 (9.8)0.803
Hard or lumpy stools70 (30.0)93 (37.5)146 (61.1)< 0.001a < b < c
Loose or watery stools54 (23.6)92 (37.2)137 (57.6)< 0.001a < b < c
Defecation straining53 (23.3)91 (37.4)144 (60.3)< 0.001a < b < c
A feeling of incomplete bowel movement51 (43.2)99 (84.6)158 (94.6)< 0.001a < b < c
Urgency8 (3.5)23 (9.6)26 (11.1)0.007a < b < c

GI, gastrointestinal; FGID, functional gastrointestinal disorder.

Data are expressed as n (%) or mean ± SE.



Genetic Polymorphisms

The G allele and G/G genotype of ADRA2A were significantly associated with NERD-FD in both sexes (P = 0.038 in total, P = 0.048 in men, and P = 0.046 in women). The T allele of GNB3 825C>T was significantly associated with IBS (P = 0.035), but there were no gender-based differences. The T allele of GNB3 825C>T was also significantly associated with increased susceptibility to NERD-FD-IBS overlap in both men (P = 0.031) and women (P = 0.044). The SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/L genotype and S allele (P = 0.049) and the SCL6A4 3609A>G G allele (P = 0.001) were associated with NERD-FD-IBS overlap, especially in women. The A allele of IL10 592C>A was associated with IBS in men (P = 0.009) (Table 4).

Table 4 . Distribution of Genetic Polymorphisms Between Control and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

GenotypesControlsFGID
TotalP-valueMenP-valueaWomenP-valueb
SLC6A4 5-HTTLPRNERD-FD-IBS
S/S92 (70.2)27 (54.0)0.04912 (63.2)0.68115 (48.4)0.024
L/S35 (26.7)18 (36.0)7 (36.8)11 (35.5)
L/L4 (3.1)5 (10.0)0 (0.0)5 (16.1)
SLC6A4 3609A>GNERD-FD-IBS
A/A187 (89.5)41 (75.9)0.00115 (75.0)0.14726 (76.5)0.028
A/G22 (10.5)12 (22.2)5 (25.0)7 (20.6)
G/G0 (0.0)1 (1.9)0 (0.0)1 (2.9)
GNB3 825C>TIBS only
C/C50 (23.8)5 (12.8)0.0352 (9.5)0.2693 (16.7)0.181
C/T98 (46.7)27 (69.3)15 (71.4)12 (66.7)
T/T62 (29.5)7 (17.9)4 (19.0)3 (16.7)
GNB3 825C>TNERD-FD-IBS
C/C50 (23.8)21 (38.9)0.0439 (45.0)0.03112 (35.3)0.044
C/T98 (46.7)24 (44.4)5 (25.0)19 (55.9)
T/T62 (29.5)9 (16.7)6 (30.0)3 (8.8)
ADRA2A 1291C>GNERD-FD
C/C21 (9.9)19 (18.6)0.0389 (24.3)0.04810 (15.4)0.046
C/G98 (46.0)35 (34.3)16 (43.2)19 (29.2)
G/G94 (44.1)48 (47.1)12 (32.4)36 (55.4)
CCKAR intron 779T>CNERD-FD-IBS
T/T113 (51.9)24 (44.4)0.42911 (55.0)0.23413 (38.2)0.456
T/C84 (38.5)26 (48.1)9 (45.0)17 (50.0)
C/C21 (9.6)4 (7.4)0 (0.0)4 (11.8)
TRPV1 945G>CNERD-FD-IBS
G/G52 (24.9)13 (24.5)0.2954 (20.0)0.5779 (27.3)0.393
G/C97 (46.4)30 (56.6)11 (55.0)19 (57.6)
C/C60 (28.7)10 (18.9)5 (25.0)5 (15.2)
TNFA 308G>ANERD-FD-IBS
G/G194 (93.3)24 (80.0)0.03211 (78.6)0.25413 (81.3)0.144
G/A13 (6.3)6 (20.0)3 (21.4)3 (18.8)
A/A1 (0.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
IL10 592C>AIBS only
C/C29 (13.9)0 (0.0)0.0470 (0.0)0.0090 (0.0)0.653
C/A86 (41.1)8 (80.0)7 (100.0)1 (33.3)
A/A94 (45.0)2 (20.0)0 (0.0)2 (66.7)

aP-values compared to men controls.

bP-values compared to women controls.

FGID, functional gastrointestinal disorder; NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; FD, functional dyspepsia; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; 5-HTTLPR, serotonin transporter long polymorphic region; GNB3, G-protein β3 gene; ADRA2A, alpha 2A adrenergic receptor gene; TRPV1, transient receptor potential ion channel of the vanilloid type 1; CCK1R, cholecystokinin receptor 1 gene; TNFA, tumor necrosis factor-α gene; IL, interleukin gene.

Data are expressed as n (%).



Changes in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder Symptoms From Baseline to Long-term Follow-up

After the initial baseline questionnaire, a follow-up questionnaire (n = 106) was used to determine the occurrence of 4 upper and 5 lower GI symptoms during the observation period. The mean period from baseline to the first follow-up (f/u1) was 38.7 ± 22.1 months, and that from the first follow-up to the second follow-up (f/u2) was 37.1 ± 21.0 months (Fig. 2J). Except for stool urgency, the intensity of all GI symptoms was more severe in the overlap FGID group than in the non-overlap FGID group, even during the follow-up period. During follow-up of the overlap FGID group, most FGID symptoms improved, such as epigastric pain (Fig. 2C), bloating (Fig. 2D), loose or watery stools (Fig. 2F), incomplete defecation (Fig. 2H), and urgency (Fig. 2I); however, symptoms of early satiation (Fig. 2A), postprandial fullness (Fig. 2B), hard or lump stool (Fig. 2E), and defecation straining (Fig. 2G) were aggravated.

Figure 2. Changes in functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) symptoms during the follow-up period. Most FGID symptoms such as epigastric pain (C), bloating (D), loose or watery stool (F), incomplete defecation (H) and urgency (I) improved; however, symptoms of early satiation (A), postprandial fullness (B), hard or lump stool (E), and defecation straining (G) were aggravated in the overlap FGID group in the second follow-up visit. Symptoms were analyzed in the follow-up 1 (f/u1) (38.7 ± 22.1 months) and follow-up 2 (f/u2) 37.1 ± 21.0 months (J) periods.

Among the various symptoms of FGID, epigastric pain was associated with anxiety and depression (Fig. 3). For patients with anxiety and depression, differences in symptoms severity between the non-overlap and overlap FGID groups were clearly revealed at initial, follow-up 1, and follow-up 2 (P = 0.009 for anxiety and P = 0.038 for depression) (Fig. 3B and 3D). In addition, there was no change in symptom severity in both non-overlap and overlap FGIDs during the follow-up period in the anxiety group (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3. Changes in epigastric pain symptom severity according to anxiety and depression during the follow-up period. There were no differences in symptoms between the non-overlap and overlap functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) in anxiety (–) and depression (–) groups (A and C), however, differences between the non-overlap and overlap FGID were revealed during the follow-up period in anxiety (+) and depression (+) groups (B and D). There was no change in symptom severity in both non-overlap and overlap FGIDs during the follow-up period in the anxiety group (B). (+), patients has anxiety or depression; (–), patients has no anxiety or depression; f/u, follow-up.

A multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether genetic polymorphisms affect the development of symptoms. Early satiation (Fig. 4A) and postprandial fullness (Fig. 4C) were most severe in patients with the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/S genotype and worsened during follow-up. In addition, the epigastric pain symptoms in patients with the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/L genotype were maintained and did not deteriorate or improve during the follow-up period (Fig 4B). Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the relationship between the genetic polymorphism and overlap syndrome. Early satiation and epigastric pain symptoms in the non-overlap FGID group were not related to the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR genotype. However, in the overlap FGID group, the L/L and L/S genotypes showed more severe symptoms than the S/S genotype (Fig. 5).

Figure 4. Changes in severity of upper gastrointestinal symptoms during the follow-up period according to the serotonin transporter gene-linked long polymorphic region (SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR) gene polymorphism. Early satiation (A) and postprandial fullness (C) were most severe in patients with the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/S genotype and were found to worsen. Epigastric pain symptoms (B) in patients with the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/L genotype were maintained and did not deteriorate or improve. L, long allele of the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR gene; S, short allele of the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR gene; f/u, follow-up.

Figure 5. Effect of the serotonin transporter gene-linked long polymorphic region (SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR) gene polymorphism on the severity of epigastric pain in patients with overlap syndrome. Early satiation and epigastric pain symptoms in the non-overlap functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) group were not related to the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR genotype (A, C). In the overlap FGID group, L/L and L/S genotypes elicited more severe symptoms than the S/S genotype (B, D). L, long allele of the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR gene; S, short allele of the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR gene; f/u, follow-up.
Discussion

In this study, we found sex/gender differences in FGID, especially in the overlap group. NERD was significantly more prevalent in men and FD was more prevalent in women. Overlap FGIDs were more prevalent than non-overlap FGIDs in women. Anxiety and depression scores were higher in the overlap FGIDs and FGID symptoms (early satiation, postprandial fullness, and epigastric pain) were more frequent and severe in the overlap FGIDs than in the non-overlap groups. Symptom progress during long-term follow-up was more frequently observed in the overlap FGIDs, especially the L/S genotype of SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR. Polymorphism of IL10 592C>A was associated with the occurrence of IBS in men, and SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR was associated with female NERD-FD-IBS.

In a previous study on the general Korean population, the dyspepsia-IBS overlap was the most common and overlap FGID developed at a younger age and was more prevalent in women than non-overlapping FGIDs.39 In another study that analyzed the relationship between FD, IBS, and reflux esophagitis patients, the odds ratio of having both FD and IBS was estimated to be 4.4 (95% CI, 1.21-15.71). However, there was no significant association between age, gender in patients with overlap syndrome.40 Lee et al11 found that, in psychiatric patients, the NERD-FD overlap was the most common among NERD, FD, IBS, and functional constipation.

Moreover, in our study, anxiety and depression scores were higher in the overlap FGID group. The frequency and severity score of various symptoms of FGIDs were higher in the overlap FGID group than in the control and non-overlapping FGID groups. Patients with both FD and IBS have been shown to experience more severe symptoms and worse QoL.41-43 In another study, Korean patients with FD-IBS overlap were frequently found to be depressed and had a poor QoL.43 Therefore, the authors of that study suggested that patients with FD-IBS overlap should be treated for their gastrointestinal symptoms and receive psychiatric support to improve their QoL and psychological distress.43

Psychosocial factors, including stress, play an important role in the expression of FGID.44 In addition, when FGID is associated with mental illness such as depression or anxiety, the symptoms will be much worse.45 In a previous study, the prevalence of depressive symptoms and anxiety in IBS patients were very high, at 22% and 30%, respectively.46 Pinto-Sanchez et al47 reported that, within the FGID group, a greater number of FGIDs was associated with a proportional increase in depression and anxiety. Recent animal studies have proposed a brain-gut-microbiome axis, in which stress changes the composition of the microbiome, and the microbiota, in turn, alter metabolism and transmission of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, gamma aminobutyric acid, and serotonin, and this influences depression and anxiety.48 Vanuytel et al49 reported that increased corticotrophin-releasing factor in the event of acute emotional stress alters intestinal permeability via the action of mast cells, and that corticotrophin-releasing factor and mast cells also affect visceral sensitivity.50

Very few studies have been conducted on the long-term follow-up of the overlap syndrome. Similar to our results, as in most observational studies, FGID symptoms improved during the follow-up period.51,52 This may be related to treatment in any form (medication or education, etc) or reassurance when visiting a hospital for FGID symptoms. However, as has already been found, FGID symptoms are often associated with other factors, especially psychological factors such as anxiety and depression,53,54 so that symptoms may not improve or rather worsen during the follow-up period. In a Belgian study in which FD patients were followed- up for 5 years, symptoms improved or disappeared in about half of FD patients, and FD symptoms were associated with anxiety.52 In an Australian study that followed FGID patients for 12 years, FGID symptoms periodically appeared and disappeared and were closely related to anxiety.17 Aro et al16 performed a 10-year follow-up of Swedish FGID patients and reported that patients with anxiety at baseline, but not depression, had a 7.6 fold higher risk of developing FD after 10 years. In the present study, the relationship between anxiety and FGID was confirmed. In overlap FGID, especially in women, and in the overlap of NERD-FD-IBS, the anxiety score was high. In addition, anxiety was associated with epigastric pain, and FGID patients with anxiety did not show significant symptom improvement during the follow-up period, indicating that patients with anxiety did not respond to general FGID treatment, especially in the non-overlap group.

Genetic studies have suggested that polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter (SERT) gene and the G-protein β3 (GNB3) C825T gene are associated with FD or IBS. The GNB3 825C>T polymorphism has been widely evaluated in FD patients.55,56 In IBS patients, the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR polymorphism has been well-studied.57,58 In the present study, the genetic polymorphisms of SERT and GNB3 were observed in NERD-FD-IBS overlap patients and that of the adrenergic receptor gene in NERD-FD patients. The SERT gene plays a role in serotonin reuptake by the presynaptic terminal. In the presence of genetic polymorphism, serotonin concentration may rise or fall, thus affecting FGID symptoms. The SERT gene was particularly associated with upper GI symptoms such as early satiation and epigastric pain. Among the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR gene polymorphism patients, these symptoms were the most severe in the L/S genotype. In particular, the symptoms of epigastric pain in patients with the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/L genotype did not improve during the follow-up period, suggesting that some symptoms affected by genetic polymorphism may not improve even with appropriate treatment. However, changes in FGID clinical symptoms during the follow-up period cannot be explained by genetic polymorphism alone. FGID mechanisms are diverse, and genetic polymorphism comprises only a small part. The patients used various drugs during the follow-up period, and various lifestyle modifications were performed in parallel. However, in some patients, symptoms improved, while in some patients, symptoms worsened. In some patients who did not respond to treatment, polymorphism such as the SERT gene may be related with this prognosis, especially in patients with overlap FGID. However, it is not easy to determine the role of genetic polymorphism by excluding a wide variety of influencing factors. Additional research is needed in the future to clarify this issue.

Our study has several limitations, such as the number of enrolled patients being relatively small especially for the genetic polymorphism study. However, among many neurotransmission-related and cytokine genes, we found that in the presence of the SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/L genotype alone, the symptoms did not improve during the mean follow-up period of 75.8 months. In addition, SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR was found to be associated with female NERD-FD-IBS (P = 0.024) patients. This implies that even if this cohort was small, SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR L/L seemed to contribute to female patients with overlap FGIDs. The second limitation concerns the definition of NERD. Theoretically, NERD is diagnosed if the 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring is positive without esophageal damage. However, most enrolled patients did not undertake this examination mainly because they refused a 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Therefore, clinically, it was difficult to completely differentiate between NERD and RH. This implies that the patients with reflux symptoms were a heterogeneous group.22

Actually, RH describe the cases between NERD and functional heartburn.23,24 However, if the patient visited with GERD symptoms and upper endoscopy ruled out ERD, usually the patient is categorized as NERD simply because we do not know if this patient is NERD or RH or FH without pH-metry or impedance study. Thus we followed this concept in the present study.

Third, there were many patients with follow-up loss. For practical reasons, we received the questionnaire in the endoscopy room whenever patients underwent endoscopy. In Korea, people aged > 40 years are recommended to undergo biannual endoscopy at the National Cancer Control Policy, free of charge. Our hospital is a tertiary institute where endoscopy is not free of charge; thus, if the patients’ symptoms disappear, they are less likely to visit the hospital for endoscopy. However, following these examinations, patients with organic diseases were excluded from this study, and only FGID patients were enrolled. Despite these limitations, our study is comprehensive regarding FGIDs related to genetic polymorphisms and questionnaires over long-term follow-up. Fourth, we could not analyze the effects of drugs such as PPI, prokinetics, and anti-spasmotics, which are basically used for FGID, and various neuromodulators that can affect not only FGID symptoms, but also anxiety and depression.

Lastly, since there is no questionnaire to evaluate esophageal symptoms in K-BDQ, the gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire was used to and evaluate the follow-up symptoms of GERD. However, since it is a questionnaire used in some studies and is not officially validated, it is thought that there are some limitations in drawing conclusions from the derived results. However, since it is a questionnaire used in the previous nationwide multi-center study,25 there may not be a significant difference in the interpretation of the results. In conclusion, patients with overlap FGIDs should be a focus of attention because they are associated with anxiety/depression and more severe symptoms, especially women. Genetic polymorphisms could also be associated with certain symptoms of overlap FGIDs. In overlap FGIDs with certain genetic factors, it may suggest reasons why some symptoms are refractory to lifestyle changes or pharmacological treatment.

Financial support

This research was supported by Support Program for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (No. 2019H1C3A1032224).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author contributions

Ju Yup Lee analyzed data and prepared the manuscript drafted; Nayoung Kim designed the study, collected data, and supervised the writing of this manuscript; Ji Hyun Park and Jeong Eun Yu performed genotyping of genetic polymorphisms; Yun Jeong Song and Jung Won Yoon managed and collected the questionnaire data; and Dong Ho Lee supervised the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final draft of this article.

References
  1. Drossman DA. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: history, pathophysiology, clinical features and Rome IV. Gastroenterology 2016;150:1262-1279.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Suzuki H, Hibi T. Overlap syndrome of functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome - are both diseases mutually exclusive? J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011;17:360-365.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Locke GR 3rd, Zinsmeister AR, Fett SL, Melton LJ 3rd, Talley NJ. Overlap of gastrointestinal symptom complexes in a US community. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2005;17:29-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Choung RS, Chang JY, Locke GR, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. Is having multiple functional gastrointestinal disorders distinct from having a single FGID? A population based study. Gastroenterology 2011;140:S708.
    CrossRef
  5. Ford AC, Marwaha A, Lim A, Moayyedi P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in individuals with dyspepsia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:401-409.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Choung RS, Locke GR, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. Do distinct dyspepsia subgroups exist in the community? A population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1983-1989.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Agréus L, Svärdsudd K, Nyrén O, Tibblin G. Irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia in the general population: overlap and lack of stability over time. Gastroenterology 1995;109:671-680.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Perri F, Clemente R, Festa V, et al. Patterns of symptoms in functional dyspepsia: role of Helicobacter pylori infection and delayed gastric emptying. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:2082-2088.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Stanghellini V, Tosetti C, Paternicò A, et al. Predominant symptoms identify different subgroups in functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2080-2085.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Talley NJ, Dennis EH, Schettler-Duncan VA, Lacy BE, Olden KW, Crowell MD. Overlapping upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with constipation or diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2454-2459.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Lee SY, Ryu HS, Choi SC, Jang SH. Psychological factors influence the overlap syndrome in functional gastrointestinal disorder and quality of life among psychiatric patients in South Korea. Psychiatry Investig 2020;17:262-267.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Yao X, Yang Y, Zhang S, Shi Y, Zhang Q, Wang Y. The impact of overlapping functional dyspepsia, belching disorders and functional heartburn on anxiety, depression and quality of life of Chinese patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol 2020;20:209.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. von Wulffen M, Talley NJ, Hammer J, et al. Overlap of irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia in the clinical setting: prevalence and risk factors. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64:480-486.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Aziz I, Palsson OS, Törnblom H, Sperber AD, Whitehead WE, Simrén M. The Prevalence and impact of overlapping Rome IV-diagnosed functional gastrointestinal disorders on somatization, quality of life, and healthcare utilization: a cross-sectional general population study in three countries. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:86-96.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Berens S, Engel F, Gauss A, et al. Patients with multiple functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) show increased illness severity: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care FGID specialty clinic. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020;2020:9086340.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Aro P, Talley NJ, Johansson SE, Agréus L, Ronkainen J. Anxiety is linked to new-onset dyspepsia in the Swedish population: a 10-year follow-up study. Gastroenterology 2015;148:928-937.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Koloski NA, Jones M, Kalantar J, Weltman M, Zaguirre J, Talley NJ. The brain--gut pathway in functional gastrointestinal disorders is bidirectional: a 12-year prospective population-based study. Gut 2012;61:1284-1290.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Adam B, Liebregts T, Holtmann G. Mechanisms of disease: genetics of functional gastrointestinal disorders--searching the genes that matter. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;4:102-110.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Choi YJ, Hwang SW, Kim N, Park JH, Oh JC, Lee DH. Association between SLC6A4 serotonin transporter gene lainked polymorphic region and ADRA2A -1291C>G and irritable bowel syndrome in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;20:388-399.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Hwang SW, Kim N, Jung HK, et al. Association of SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR and TRPV1 945G>C with functional dyspepsia in Korea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:1770-1777.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Choi YJ, Kim N, Yoon H, et al. Overlap between irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia including subtype analyses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;32:1553-1561.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Savarino E, Zentilin P, Savarino V. NERD: an umbrella term including heterogeneous subpopulations. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;10:371-380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Hungin APS, Molloy-Bland M, Scarpignato C. Revisiting Montreal: new insights into symptoms and their causes, and implications for the future of GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114:414-421.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Aziz Q, Fass R, Gyawali CP, Miwa H, Pandolfino JE, Zerbib F. Functional esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology 2016;150:1368-1379.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Lee JH, Kim N, Chung IK, et al. Clinical significance of minimal change lesions of the esophagus in a healthy Korean population: a nationwide multi-center prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;23:1153-1157.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Kim N, Lee SW, Cho SI, et al. The prevalence of and risk factors for erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease: a nationwide multicentre prospective study in Korea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;27:173-185.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Park JJ, Kim JW, Kim HJ, et al. The prevalence of and risk factors for Barrett's esophagus in a Korean population: a nationwide multicenter prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:907-914.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Shim KN, Hong SJ, Sung JK, et al. Clinical spectrum of reflux esophagitis among 25,536 Koreans who underwent a health check-up: a nationwide multicenter prospective, endoscopy-based study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:632-638.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Lee ES, Kim N, Lee SH, et al. Comparison of risk factors and clinical responses to proton pump inhibitors in patients with erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;30:154-164.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Fass R, Fennerty MB, Vakil N. Nonerosive reflux disease--current concepts and dilemmas. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:303-314.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Noh YW, Jung HK, Kim SE, Jung SA. Overlap of erosive and non-erosive reflux dseases with functional gastrointestinal disorders according to Rome III criteria. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010;16:148-156.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Tack J, Talley NJ, Camilleri M, et al. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1466-1479.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Vakil N, Halling K, Ohlsson L, Wernersson B. Symptom overlap between postprandial distress and epigastric pain syndromes of the Rome III dyspepsia classification. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:767-774.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1480-1491.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Song KH, Jung HK, Min BH, et al. Development and validation of the Korean Rome III questionnaire for diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;19:509-515.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:920-924.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Kim JY, Kim N, Seo PJ, et al. Association of sleep dysfunction and emotional status with gastroesophageal reflux disease in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;19:344-354.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:69-77.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Lee SY, Lee KJ, Kim SJ, Cho SW. Prevalence and risk factors for overlaps between gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study. Digestion 2009;79:196-201.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Park H. Functional gastrointestinal disorders and overlap syndrome in Korea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26(suppl 3):12-14.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Corsetti M, Caenepeel P, Fischler B, Janssens J, Tack J. Impact of coexisting irritable bowel syndrome on symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1152-1159.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Wang A, Liao X, Xiong L, et al. The clinical overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome based on Rome III criteria. BMC Gastroenterol 2008;8:43.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Lee HJ, Lee SY, Kim JH, et al. Depressive mood and quality of life in functional gastrointestinal disorders: differences between functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and overlap syndrome. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010;32:499-502.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Bennett EJ, Piesse C, Palmer K, Badcock CA, Tennant CC, Kellow JE. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: psychological, social, and somatic features. Gut 1998;42:414-420.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Lee SP, Sung IK, Kim JH, Lee SY, Park HS, Shim CS. The effect of emotional stress and depression on the prevalence of digestive diseases. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;21:273-282.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Thijssen AY, Jonkers DM, Leue C, et al. Dysfunctional cognitions, anxiety and depression in irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010;44:e236-e241.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Pinto-Sanchez MI, Ford AC, Avila CA, et al. Anxiety and depression increase in a stepwise manner in parallel with multiple FGIDs and symptom severity and frequency. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1038-1048.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Foster JA, McVey Neufeld KA. Gut-brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci 2013;36:305-312.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Vanuytsel T, van Wanrooy S, Vanheel H, et al. Psychological stress and corticotropin-releasing hormone increase intestinal permeability in humans by a mast cell-dependent mechanism. Gut 2014;63:1293-1299.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Larauche M. Novel insights in the role of peripheral corticotropin-releasing factor and mast cells in stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;24:201-205.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Ivashkin VT, Poluektova EA, Glazunov AB, Putilovskiy MA, Epstein OI. Pathogenetic approach to the treatment of functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract and their intersection: results of the Russian observation retrospective program COMFORT. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;20:2.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. Kindt S, Van Oudenhove L, Mispelon L, Caenepeel P, Arts J, Tack J. Longitudinal and cross-sectional factors associated with long-term clinical course in functional dyspepsia: a 5-year follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:340-348.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Koloski NA, Talley NJ, Boyce PM. Does psychological distress modulate functional gastrointestinal symptoms and health care seeking? A prospective, community Cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:789-797.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  54. Alander T, Svärdsudd K, Johansson SE, Agréus L. Psychological illness is commonly associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders and is important to consider during patient consultation: a population-based study. BMC Med 2005;3:8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Saito YA, Mitra N, Mayer EA. Genetic approaches to functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology 2010;138:1276-1285.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Oshima T, Toyoshima F, Nakajima S, Fukui H, Watari J, Miwa H. Genetic factors for functional dyspepsia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26(suppl 3):83-87.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Saito YA. The role of genetics in IBS. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2011;40:45-67.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Camilleri M, Katzka DA. Irritable bowel syndrome: methods, mechanisms, and pathophysiology. Genetic epidemiology and pharmacogenetics in irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2012;302:G1075-G1084.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef


This Article


Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)

Author ORCID Information

Services
Social Network Service

e-submission

Archives

Aims and Scope