Because of the sex-gender differences that are shown in a diversity of physiological and psychological factors, it can be speculated that the clinical presentation of symptoms as well as treatment strategies in women and men with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may differ. Studies have revealed that IBS is more common in women than men. As for the IBS subtype, IBS with constipation is significantly more prevalent among women than men. Sex hormones and gender differences may play important roles in the pathophysiology of IBS. However, its pathophysiologic mechanisms still remain largely unknown, and therapeutic implications are limited. Moreover, women IBS patients have been reported to feel more fatigue, depression, anxiety, and lower quality of life than men IBS patients. Furthermore, there has been evidence of differences in the appropriate treatment efficacy to IBS in men and women, although relatively few men are enrolled in most relevant clinical trials. A more sex-gender-oriented approach in the medical care setting could improve understanding of heterogeneous patients suffering from IBS. An individualized and multicomponent approach including sex and gender issues might help improve the treatment of IBS.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID), defined by abdominal pain and abnormal bowel habits with no detectable organic disease.1 The pathophysiology of IBS is multifactorial with sex-gender factors seeming to play important roles, as previous studies have suggested there to be sex and gender-associated differences in the prevalence and subtypes of IBS, as well as the effectiveness of treatment for IBS. Interestingly, most FGIDs in general show female predominance.2
Sex means biological distinctions characterizing males and females, whereas gender reflects sex-related social roles with which an individual identifies, and that presumably reflect learned femininity or masculinity.3 Sex or gender-specific medicine is a rising medical field in which relevant differences between males and females are recognized and actively utilized in both diagnosis and treatment. Gender is assumed to be a crucial factor in the pathogenesis, disease progression, and even prognosis of various diseases.4–6
However, there have been only a few reports of gender differences in FGIDs, mostly on prevalence,7 specified gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms,8 or quality of life (QoL)9 seen in IBS. Even though IBS is more common in women, the underlying mechanism by which women exhibit an increased vulnerability to IBS remains largely unknown, and therapeutic treatments are also limited.2
From this background, our review article focuses on sex and gender differences with regard to the prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and treatment of IBS based on valuable studies in the literature.
First, we set up a search strategy for PubMed with combined MeSH terms and free text terms in order to build a broad discovery net for articles on IBS and these terms; sex, gender, epidemiology or prevalence, pathophysiology, sex hormone, symptoms, and treatment. These searches were performed targeting only full literatures written in English.
All searches were completed by 20th April, 2018 (Fig. 1). Every retrieved abstract was reviewed in order to investigate whether the results included sex or gender differences, as well as whether original data revealed abstracts satisfying these criteria were included in the next level of review regarding study design, subjects, and clinical variables. Next, we reviewed full text articles that met our inclusion criteria, based on the contents of the abstract.
We then retrieved related articles and reviewed their reference lists. Finally, we found a total of 170 suitable articles, of which 84 articles were excluded because they were irrelevant to the specific questions being asked. Finally, 86 original articles were included in our review.
However, the prevalence of IBS could differ depending on the clinical setting in terms of race, geography, community base, or whether a study was performed in a primary or tertiary hospital setting, as well as the enrolled number of men or women, definition criteria for IBS used (Rome vs Manning), or method of data collection (Postal questionnaire, telephone interview, self-administered questionnaire, or interview-administered questionnaire).12–18 Moreover, differences in access to health care and cultural factors, such as help-seeking behavior, may contribute to prevalence differences as well.6,13,15–18
A recent systemic review for 83 studies conducted in 41 countries including 288 103 participants (55.0% women) by a Rome foundation working team showed significant variation in pooled regional prevalence; the mean prevalence among individual countries ranged from 1.1% in France and Iran to 35.5% in Mexico.19 Even among studies conducted within the same country, there were significant differences in prevalence.19 Considering sex difference in pooled prevalence, women showed higher prevalence than men (10.2% vs 8.8%), and the prevalences were also higher in women than men in each region separately.19 However, an Indian study showed a higher prevalence among men than women because men more often consult doctors than women do in India.19,20
Another systemic review and meta-analysis for 55 studies containing 162 543 subjects showed that the pooled prevalence of IBS was higher in women than in men (14.0% vs 8.9%; OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.53–1.82).15
The prevalence of IBS in women may also vary according to geographic region.13 In Asia the distribution is fairly equal between men and women, but in the United States, Israel, and Canada, the disorder is twice as prevalent in women. The differences in the OR of IBS in women compared to those in men according to geographical location were statistically significant (Cochran Q, 82.89;
However, until now, it has been unclear whether the gender difference in the prevalence of IBS is actually associated with physiologic differences or differing medical care-seeking behaviors. Medical care-seeking behaviors can be affected by several factors, such as disease severity, accessibility, psychological stress, and socio-cultural circumstances.22,23
In general, women have been shown to have higher risk for post-infection IBS. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed that women, particularly those with severe enteritis, are at increased risk for developing IBS. Female sex was associated with a 2.2 times higher OR of developing postinfectious IBS (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.57–3.07).24
The sex-related difference in the prevalence of IBS appears around puberty and increases during the early adult years.25 In women, IBS occurs most commonly from the late teens to the mid-forties. As age continues to increase thereafter, the incidence of IBS in women decreases and approaches the rate in men around the age of 70 years old and above.25 In contrast, the prevalence of IBS among men remains constant from 20 to 70 years of age.25,26 It has been suggested that sex hormones play a potential role in these gender differences regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment outcome in IBS patients, as well as the association between IBS symptoms and sex hormonal status (menstrual cycle phases, pregnancy, menopause, and hormonal replacement therapy).25,27
IBS is mainly classified according to the predominant bowel habit, such as IBS with constipation (IBS-C), IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), IBS with mixed bowel habits (IBS-M), and unclassified IBS.28
There are gender differences in IBS symptoms; specifically IBS-C is predominant in women whereas IBS-D is predominant in men.12,16 In a systematic review and meta-analysis performed for 22 studies regarding gender differences in IBS symptoms, women were found to be more likely to report abdominal pain and constipation-related symptoms than men (all
In addition, the prevalences of chronic pain disorders that often overlap with IBS, such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, chronic pelvic pain, and migraine headache, are higher in women with IBS, suggesting an association between their symptoms and hormonal statuses.25,27,29–32 Women report more frequent and severe IBS symptoms during menstruation such as loose stools, bloating, and worsening of abdominal pain, increases that are likely related to changes in the menstrual cycle.25
In a population-based postal study performed in Iceland, women with dysmenorrhea were revealed to experience IBS symptoms more frequently than those without dysmenorrhea.33 In addition, menopause seems to be associated with the exacerbation of IBS symptoms. That is, women reported more severe abdominal pain following menopause than before menopause.32 However, another study demonstrated that there was no significant difference (
Considering the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on IBS symptoms, Ruigomez et al36 demonstrated that women undergoing HRT are at an increased risk of developing IBS than women who do not. However, a different study indicated that the prevalence and severity of IBS symptoms were similar among non-HRT users and HRT users.36 Gonenne et al37 showed that postmenopausal healthy women who had taken estradiol or progesterone for 7 days reported more frequent loose stools and greater ease in defecation than those on placebo. Therefore, in the case of women with IBS symptoms, more attention should be paid to menstrual irregularities, menopausal status, the use of contraceptives and hormone-replacement therapy, and history of gynecological surgery.38
The contributing factors that most influence clinical manifestation and physiologic responses in men and women with IBS are hormonal factors, visceral hypersensitivity, behavioral stress response, changes in gut microbiome, psychological factors, and intestinal motor and sensory functions, which are closely associated with gut-brain interactions (Fig. 2).34,39–43 However, the exact mechanisms remain unclear.
Female sex hormones have been known to be important factors modulating the susceptibility to stress, gut motility, and visceral pain perception by interacting with neuromodulator systems and the emotional system (Fig. 2).34 Estrogen and progesterone are known to inhibit smooth muscle contraction. In addition, progesterone modulates the colonic 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) system, which is known to control peristalsis. Women with IBS experience constipation more often than do men with IBS,44 except during menstrual periods, when ovarian hormone levels are low. Women are also known to have slower GI transit than men.45 The colonic transit times in women are delayed when women have higher levels of ovarian hormones.46
While most studies investigating sex-related differences in IBS have focused on the concept of female susceptibility, there has not been enough research on the role of male hormones.
Androgens have been reported to protect against the development of chronic pain disorders in humans, and testosterone has shown an analgesic effect in experimental pain models.47 Differences in androgen levels, receptors, and action sites may play a role in the sex differences in both IBS and the development of chronic pain disorders.48
A recent study showed that middle-aged men with IBS tended to have lower levels of luteinizing hormone than healthy men, and that IBS symptomatology tended to be inversely related to testosterone.49 In addition, Kim et al50 demonstrated elevated levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) as well as testosterone, in young, male IBS patients compared to controls, suggesting that high SHBG concentration may play a role in the development of IBS.
There has been no conclusive data suggesting that gender influences visceral pain perception in healthy and IBS subjects.11 In general, women tend to report more severe, more frequent, and longer lasting pain than men.51,52 Studies comparing women with IBS with healthy women have shown that visceral perception is similar or increased in women with IBS compared to healthy women.11,53 Women also tended to report more abdominal pain, elevated pain perception, and discomfort during colorectal distension than men.12,46,53–55
Estrogen is known to be a central nervous system stimulant, and androgen receptor mediation is associated with the inhibition of the central nervous system (Fig. 2), which has been suggested to lower the incidence of chronic pain disorders in men.52 A previous study has indicated that men and women respond differently to intestinal stimuli, due to morphological and functional brain differences in men and women with IBS.46 Women with IBS have also shown increased activation in areas related to the processing of emotional responses, including the amygdala and infragenual cerebral cortex, compared to men with IBS.
IBS has been reported to be associated with changes in cytokine profiles.56,57 A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that inflammatory cytokines in patients with IBS vary between men and women. Serum TNF-α levels were higher in women with IBS than in men with IBS, and interleukin (IL)-10 levels were significantly lower in men with IBS than male controls, suggesting that elevated baseline IL-10 levels in healthy men appear to serve as a protective factor against IBS.58 Another study measuring the inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress biomarkers in men and women with IBS found that pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17 and TNF-α) increased and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) decreased in women compared to men.34 Furthermore, women with IBS have been shown to have an increased number of colonic mucosal mast cells and decreased numbers of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells,58 suggesting that mucosal immune activation is sex dependent in IBS.2 However, more studies are needed in order to properly investigate whether or not stratifying IBS patients based on cytokine profile or gene polymorphisms provides new opportunities for the personalized treatment of this condition.59
Psychological stress affects transcellular permeability in the colon, as well as the jejunum via mast cell and eosinophil activation.60–63 Cold pain stress has been revealed to induce more potent and sustained increases in albumin, mannitol, and xylose absorption in the jejunal lumen in women with higher background stress.64
Chronic psychological stress affects epithelial tight junction protein levels in the colon.63 A recent study demonstrated that corticosterone mediated the chronic psychological stress-induced increase in intestinal permeability in rats via the decreased levels of claudin-1, occludin, and zona occludens-1 expression (Fig. 2).63 It is well known that estrogen plays an important role in maintaining the function of the GI epithelial barrier.64 Estrogens have been associated with alterations in calcium and vitamin D transport in the colon cell line Caco-2,65 in the increase of occludin and junctional adhesion molecule A mRNA and protein expression in the colons of female rats, Caco-2 cells,66 and ovariectomized rats exposed to the chemical estrogen bisphenol A.67 More importantly, 2 weeks of oral treatment with a phytoestrogen-rich soy germ-fermented ingredient has been shown to prevent the stress-induced hyper-permeability and visceral hypersensitivity in female rats through estrogen receptor activation.68
However, the roles of sex hormones in the regulation of intestinal permeability have not yet been clearly understood. The effects of stress on intestinal barrier function are complex, and the roles of sex hormones are inconsistent. Further studies are needed to elucidate these roles.
Gut microbiota play key roles in modulating the gut-brain interaction and intestinal barrier function (Fig. 2).69,70 However, the interaction of sex with gut microbiota requires further investigation. The persistent loss of microbiomes and gut-brain homeostasis could lead to lower grade inflammation and immune dysfunction, which are associated with abnormalities in secretion, changes in visceral pain recognition, and changes in motility.60
Sex hormones directly affect bacterial metabolism as well as the growth and expression of virulence factors through steroid nuclear receptor expression including that of ERβ.71 A recent study showed that early life microbial exposure affects the determination of sex hormone levels and modify the progression to autoimmunity in a non-obese diabetic mouse model of type 1 diabetes.72 The enhancement of testosterone production in pubescent male mice has been reported to induce changes in the gut microbiota, which consequently have protected T- and B-cell function development related to autoimmune diseases.72
Animal studies have found that male microbiota could be transferred to a young female and returned to the male by castration.73–75 Interestingly, a recent study has shown that male and female rat gut microbes present a different profile of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) when metabolizing a diet supplemented in oligofructose.76 Actually, SCFAs such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate plays an important role as energy source, inflammation modulator and a part of gut motility and wound healing.77
However, there are some limitations in translating study results on the effects of sex hormones on the mucosal and the microbiota–gut-brain axis into clinical practice, as most of these studies have been performed in experimental laboratory animals.69 This is mainly because long-term diet control is nearly impossible in humans. In addition, results relating to sex hormone effects on gut microbiota have been inconsistent thus far.60 More research is needed on the important roles and complex interactions of intestinal microorganisms in relation to gender differences in IBS.
IBS is known to have significant impacts on the QoL of patients.9,78 However, limited data are available as to whether the impact of IBS on life differs between women and men.13 Simrén et al79 found that women with IBS reported lower QoL; higher levels of fatigue, depression, and anxiety; and less positive well-being and self-control than men with IBS. Our team has also found similar results in functional dyspepsia between women and men.80 A recent study investigating IBS-SSS, self-reported GI symptoms, and QoL in men and women found that the severities of abdominal bloating, flatulence, and rumbling were higher in women than in men, along with dissatisfaction with bowel habits.34 Women’s IBS-QoL scores were significantly lower than those of men with IBS (
In a study performed in Korea, health-related QoL (HRQoL) was significantly lower in women with IBS than in men with IBS (
In an outpatient study on IBS, women were found to be more likely to avoid certain foods, jobs, domestic activities, sexual intercourse, and socializing than men.82 In addition, women IBS patients showed less decision-making authority in planning their work schedule, fewer opportunities to learn at work, and required more long-term sick leave than the control group.
It has been suggested that the impaired HRQoL of IBS patients can be explained by psychological factors.83–85 However, there have been limited studies on the gender differences related to social factors and psychological symptoms in IBS patients,31 so further studies are needed.
It is important to focus on both improving QoL as well as alleviating the symptoms of IBS in the treatment of IBS patients. A physician-patient relationship based on enhanced mutual understanding that helps patients make sense of IBS symptoms could improve their ability to manage their IBS in a psychologically-flexible way, consequently helping them maintain the QoL.86
Gender differences in responsibilities and roles, such as in unpaid caring work as well as in paid work, can influence the manifestation of IBS symptoms via stress, beyond health care-seeking behavior.87–89 Within society, there are certain expectations of women or men that influence how they behave as patients and what they reveal in health care settings. Gender related cultural issues can play a role in the observed differences between female and male IBS patients.87
Women are socialized to think that bodily functions are private and that losing control is shameful. They are also sometimes socialized to want to be thin and attractive.88,89 Toner and Akman reported that women with IBS were more worried about losing control over their bodily functions than were men with IBS, and that they were particularly concerned about diarrhea.22 Women have also reported feeling more anxious about the effects of IBS on their appearance and self-expression, including feeling clean, smelling good, not showing bloating, and being slim.22 On the other hand, men with IBS with higher scores on characteristics traditionally thought to be female, such as bring-up and emotions, showed similar attitudes to IBS women for disease.90 A significant reduction in male-trait scores in men with IBS compared to healthy controls has also been demonstrated.51
A study performed in an outpatient clinic using interpretative methods showed that women were affected by how IBS interrupts their relational responsibilities as partners and mothers as well as their work decrement.91 Men, on the other hand, were affected by how IBS interrupts their construction of masculinity through the ‘female health concern’ label attached to the disorder and the ways in which symptoms make them feel weak and unable to do anything, thereby preventing them from reliably being able to support their families.91 The better the relationship between the physician and the patient, the more effective the IBS treatment. Therefore, a more gender-oriented approach in clinical settings will increase understanding among patients suffering from IBS.89,91
The treatment of IBS is important because symptoms can seriously degrade health-related quality of life, leading to increased use of health care and reduced work productivity.92,93 Treatments include support and reassurance, psychological interventions, dietary manipulation, alteration of the gut microbiota, and pharmacologic agents.94,95 Because of gender differences in the prevalence and pathophysiology of IBS, an individualized and multicomponent approach considering sex and gender issue is necessary for treatment.39,96
Many pharmacotherapy studies have suggested that gender related differences may exist with respect to response to medication treatment.97 For IBS-D, constipating drugs such as loperamide and atropine, diphenoxylate, or bile acid can be used.17 Thus far, there have been no reports of sex differences in the responses to these drugs.16,17,96 However, it is difficult to assess differences in responses to pharmacological treatment because most of these trials predominantly include women.2 Even though 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and 5-HT4 receptor agonists were reported to be more effective in treating IBS symptoms in women than in men, the exact mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear.98–101 Alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist currently approved to treat women with severe IBS-D, has been shown to significantly improve the symptoms of women with IBS but not men with IBS98 (Table). In a follow-up study enrolling only men, IBS pain, discomfort, and stool consistency were significantly improved with alosetron treatment, but other IBS symptoms did not improve.102 A meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of alosetron demonstrated that it was effective in both women and men with IBS.103 Another 5-HT3 receptor antagonist for IBS-D, cilansetron, was found to be more effective in women that in men, although there was still an overall significant symptom improvement in men (Table).104 The 5-HT4 receptor agonist tegaserod has also been reported to have greater efficacy in women with IBS.96,120 However, it is unclear whether this truly reflects genuine sex differences because studies have thus far been conducted on only a few men. Further research is needed, and these limitations should be considered when evaluating drug therapy.96,106,107 In contrast to the above treatments, the prescription of another 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ramosetron, has been limited to men with IBS-D, because its clinical efficacy has only been confirmed in men (Table).108,109 However, in a later randomized, placebo-controlled study that included female patients, a half-dose of ramosetron (2.5 μg per day) was shown to reduce the symptoms of IBS and to improve the patients’ QoL.110,121 In addition, a recent meta-analysis based on 4 randomized controlled trials involving 1623 subjects showed that ramosetron was effective in relieving overall IBS symptoms in both men and women.122
IBS has also shown a familial clustering, and has been considered a complex genetic disorder, in which multiple genetic variants on several genes contribute to the development of this condition. The serotonin transporter protein is encoded by a single gene (
Lubiprostone, a chloride channel-2 activator, has only been approved for treatment in women with IBS-C, because it has been shown to be more effective for women with IBS-C than men.97 This increased efficacy is also shown in Table. However, although only a small number of men have participated in studies on lubiprostone, it has turned out to be an effective remedy for chronic idiopathic constipation in both women and men.115 This indicates that the determination of whether or not lubiprostone is truly a sex specific drug is limited, because the enrolled number of men in previous studies was low.97 Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C receptor agonist, has been shown to be effective in both women and men IBS patients with constipation and chronic idiopathic constipation.117,125 Eluxadoline, a μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-opioid receptor antagonist which has been approved as a therapeutic agent for IBS-D,118 has been associated with reduced abdominal pain and improved stool consistency in both women and men receiving 100 mg twice daily with sustained efficacy for more than 6 months in large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (Table).126
Patients with IBS have altered intestinal microbiota compared to healthy individuals.105 Recently, rifaximin has been approved for IBS-D. A set of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (TARGET 1 and TARGET 2) demonstrated that patients (female 67.0%) who had IBS without constipation that were treated with rifaximin for 2 weeks showed significant improvement in IBS symptoms, bloating, abdominal pain, and loose or watery stools.92 In a recent phase 3 study of patients (female 68.0%) with relapsing symptoms of IBS-D, repeated rifaximin treatment showed significant relief of daily ratings of IBS symptoms, bloating, abdominal pain, and stool consistency.111 However, the above studies for rifaximin did not conduct separate analyses by gender.
A recently-updated systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that antidepressants and psychological therapies are effective treatments for IBS.112 A meta-analysis reviewing 7 randomized controlled trials with a total of 374 patients revealed that hypnotherapy significantly improved abdominal pain, at least in the short-term.113 Hypnotherapy was also beneficial for overall GI symptoms and QoL.113 However, evidence for the long-term efficacy of hypnotherapy is lacking due to an insufficient number of studies. Moreover, most psychological and behavioral treatment trials did not conduct separate analyses by gender.2
For the treatment of IBS, modest benefits over placebo have been reported with fiber, anticholinergics, and peppermint oil.90 However, since the randomization or allocation concealment is not explicitly described in many studies, the selection bias is also unclear. In addition, no separate analysis of gender difference was undertaken.2,127
For other drugs commonly used to treat motility disturbance (domperidone, opioid-based constipating agents, and laxatives), there is no evidence of any gender-related differences in efficacy.96
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics have often been considered to be important determinants of the clinical effect of drug treatment.128,129 Most medications for IBS are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) pathway, which could be affected by the female sex hormones of estrogen and progesterone.130 Women generally have less lean body mass that can affect drug clearance, different activities of CYP enzymes (40.0% increase in CYP3A4, various reductions in CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP1A2), and different drug metabolism rates with men.129,130
In addition, women have been shown to have a significantly higher risk of developing adverse drug reactions than men.129,131 However, clinically significant differences in therapeutic responses based on gender differences in pharmacokinetics seem to be uncommon.2,89,132 Further studies are warranted to further clear up those issues.
Some patients do not respond well to treatment. A recent multicenter study analyzed risk factors for poor treatment response in Japanese IBS patients.133 It found that lower mental component summary and the female sex were independent risk factors for poor treatment response.133 The reason for the poor treatment response in women may be related to the higher incidences of anxiety, depression, or stronger psychological symptoms in women, which are also risk factors for poor treatment response in patients with IBS.134,135 Further understanding these mechanisms could help to improve treatment effectiveness.
Probiotics could be an effective treatment for IBS in terms of symptom improvement. A systematic review analyzing 18 randomized controlled trials including 1650 patients with IBS found that probiotics were statistically significantly better than placebo with a number needed to treat of 4.135 Probiotics has been reported to have an anti-nociceptive effect on stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity in animal models, and they are known to increase the expression of opioid and cannabinoid receptors in intestinal epithelial cells.136 Probiotics have also been reported to inhibit micro-inflammation of the intestine.137 However, the therapeutic effect of probiotics in IBS depends on the strains of probiotics used and the different mixtures and dosages of these strains.137 In addition, differences in the numbers of men and women participating in the study may have an impact on the effectiveness of probiotics treatments because of differences in the courses of IBS in men and women. Gender differences may also influence the response to probiotics in IBS treatment, but these differences have not yet been fully explored.137
A recent study by Lee et al61 investigated the effect of probiotics in the repeated water avoidance stress (rWAS)-induced colonic microinflammation model of Wistar rats in a sex-specific manner. Chronic psychological stress (rWAS) was found to significantly increase bowel frequency, and induce visceral analgesia in female rats, but not in males.4,61 In addition, the number of mast cells in the distal colon was significantly higher in female rats of the WAS group, and the modulation effect of probiotics was greater in female rats than in male rats.61 Similarly, rWAS induced the mRNA expression of various colonic mucosal cytokines, and probiotics therapy decreased these only in female rats, suggesting that there is a sex-related difference in the micro-inflammation of the colon.61 These results can help to understand the role of probiotics in IBS and suggest the possibility of using mast cells and cytokines as treatment targets in women with IBS.61
Patients have suggested that diet has a role in the pathogenesis of the syndrome itself and also as a trigger of symptoms.138 Two-thirds of IBS patients believe that their complaints are related to food.139 Putative food intolerances are reported by 20–70% of patients with IBS, although true allergies are rare.140 Therefore, dietary management is recommended as an important part of the treatment of IBS.141–143
In a study conducted to investigate food groups and specific food items that cause GI symptoms in IBS patients, women tended to report more food items that cause symptoms than men.144 Increased fiber and fish intake, decreased fatty meal intake, reduced sweets, red meat, and reduced coffee and alcohol intake were all significantly different between the case and control groups of women. The male IBS group showed only significantly lower bread intake than the male control group. As the number of foods reported to cause GI symptoms increased, the QoL of the patients were decreased, which was also related to energy, food, sleep, social role, and physical condition.144 In addition, female IBS patients were more willing to change their dietary habits due to GI trouble than men. The majority of women and men who changed their dietary habits due to GI trouble reported improvement of their symptoms.144 A large cross-sectional French cohort study evaluating the association between vegetarian diet and IBS reported a higher prevalence of IBS in women than in men (5.6% vs 4.8%;
Increases in certain types of carbohydrates in one’s diet can worsen IBS symptoms, particularly of sugars (monosaccharides and disaccharides) and polyols, which are slowly absorbed in the small intestine rather than digested, and can induce luminal expansion through a variety of mechanisms.141 A recent systematic review of 9 randomized trials reported a short-term benefit of low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) diet for IBS patients considering GI symptoms, abdominal pain, and QoL improvement, while adverse effects were not reported.119 With regard to the participants, between 67.0% and 86.0% (median: 71.0%) of subjects in each study were women.144 Another meta-analysis comparing the treatment effect of a low FODMAP diet for IBS symptoms and QoL to that of a regular, standard IBS diet with high FODMAP demonstrated that the low FODMAP diets were associated with overall improvement of IBS symptoms.145 However, the long-term outcomes and safety of low FODMAP diets remain to be investigated.145 Sex difference in the benefits of low FODMAP diet have not yet been analyzed either. Larger multicenter trials are needed to better elucidate the mechanisms involved and to identify the subsets of patients who are more likely to respond to this relatively complex dietary intervention by considering gender issues.119,145
To date, several studies have demonstrated that there are sex- and gender-differences in the prevalence, pathophysiology, symptoms, gender role, and treatment response of IBS. For one, IBS occurs more often in women than in men. However, the reasons for why IBS is predominant in women remain to be explored in detail. With regard to symptoms, women more often complain of abdominal pain and constipation-related symptoms, while men more commonly report diarrhea-related symptoms. Despite limited comprehensive data, sex hormones are believed to contribute to these gender differences as well as cultural factors and gender roles. Many studies have indicated that sex hormones affect the regulatory mechanisms of the gut-brain axis, stress response, visceral sensitivity and motility, intestinal barrier function, immune activation of intestinal mucosa, and gut microbiota. Women with IBS tend to report lower QoL, more fatigue, depressed mood, less positive well-being and self-control, and higher levels of anxiety than men with IBS. Although relatively few men have participated in clinical trials in pharmacologic treatment, there have been several points of evidence indicating sex differences in the treatment response. Understanding these gender differences in the medical care environment and applying them to IBS patients is important because it can provide better clinical outcomes. Individualized and multicomponent approaches considering sex and gender issues are also necessary for the improved treatment of IBS.