Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility : eISSN 2093-0887 / pISSN 2093-0879

Table. 2.

Esophageal Physiologic Test Results in Responders and Non-responders

Esophageal physiologic test variables Non-responders(n = 105) Responders(n = 99) P-value
MII-pH
AET (%) 4.2 (1.3) 7.8 (2.4) 0.034
Upright AET (%) 6.2 (2.1) 6.7 (2.3) 0.225
Supine AET (%) 2.1 (0.9) 9.0 (3.4) 0.003
Reflux episodes 51 (17) 64 (23) 0.344
MNBI 3 cm (Ω) 2108 (412) 1607 (235) 0.027
MNBI 5 cm (Ω) 2057 (436) 1654 (258) 0.024
HRMBasal LES pressure (mmHg) 23.7 (3.3) 20.4 (2.8) 0.033
EGJ-CI (mmHg∙cm) 30 (4.2) 22 (2.1) 0.011
IRP (mmHg) 8.2 (1.5) 7.7 (1.2) 0.448
DCI (mmHg∙cm∙sec) 1641 (158) 1236 (116) 0.029
Absent peristalsis 7 (7%) 8 (8%) 0.789
DES 1 (1%) 0 (0.%) 0.884
Fragmented peristalsis 10 (9%) 5 (5%) 0.278
IEM 11 (10%) 15 (15%) 0.402
Normal peristalsis 76 (73%) 71 (72%) 0.896

MII-pH, multichannel intraluminal impedance pH; AET, acid exposure time; MNBI, mean nocturnal baseline impedance; HRM, high-resolution manometry; LES, lower esophageal sphincter; EGJ-CI, esophagogastric junction contractile integral; IRP, integrated relaxation pressure; DCI, distal contractile integral; DES, distal esophageal spasm; IEM, ineffective esophageal motility.

Data are presented as mean (SD) or number (%).

J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020;26:447~454 https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm19153
© J Neurogastroenterol Motil