We attempted to examine the relationship between abnormal findings on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) of the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES), and to identify the risk factors for aspiration.
We performed VFSS and HRM on the same day in 36 ischemic stroke patients (mean age, 67.5 years) with dysphagia. Pressure (basal, median intra bolus, and nadir), relaxation time interval of the UES, and mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractility (as a contractile integral) were examined using HRM. The parameters of VFSS were vallecular residue, pyriform sinus residue, vallecular overflow, penetration, and aspiration. The association between the parameters of VFSS and HRM was analyzed by the Student’s
Three (8.3%) and 4 (11.1%) stroke patients with dysphagia had pyriform sinus residue and vallecular sinus residue, respectively, and 5 (13.8%) patients showed aspiration. Mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractile integrals in patients with residue in the pyriform sinus were significantly lower than those in patients without residue in the pyriform sinus (
Manometric measurements of the pharynx and UES were well correlated with abnormal findings in the VFSS, and a shorter relaxation time interval of the UES during deglutition is an important parameter for the development of aspiration.
Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common symptom in stroke patients. It has been reported that approximately 50% of all patients experience swallowing difficulty with or without aspiration after a stroke. Dysphagia can cause an increase in the risk for medical complications such as aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition in stroke patients. To predict and minimize these complications, clinical diagnosis of dysphagia is very important.1
Videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is the gold standard test used for the evaluation of dysphagia. VFSS can visualize the rapid sequence of swallowing events and helps to identify movements of the bolus, such as aspiration and pooling in the pyriform sinus and vallecula.2,3 Furthermore, VFSS is a valuable test in detecting stroke patients with aspiration at risk of aspiration pneumonia.4 However, interpretation of the results of VFSS is dependent upon the competence of examiners,5,6 and they can only show findings resulting from neuromuscular causes of oropharyngeal dysphagia.7
The objective measure of pharyngeal strength is pharyngeal manometry. Until recently, several studies have evaluated the relationship between measures of VFSS and pharyngeal manometry. Solid state computerized manometry can provide potentially important additional information in the diagnosis of dysphagia patients8 and manometric measures such as pharyngeal maximum pressure and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) residual pressure were suggested to be reliable indicators of possible pressure deficits of swallowing.9,10 However, although the studies have confirmed the close relationship between VFSS and manometry, they could not suggest the possible mechanisms of VFSS findings based on the results of high-resolution manometry (HRM), probably due to the lack of manometric metrics reflecting the physiologic status of the mesopharynx, hypopharynx, and UES.
Recently, simultaneous examination of the HRM and VFSS was verified to be helpful in understanding the swallowing mechanisms, and also new manometric metrics were developed for the analysis of pharyngeal and UES function.11 Therefore, in this study, we attempted to evaluate the relationship between new manometric metrics and abnormal VFSS findings in stroke patients with dysphagia, and to investigate the risk factors for aspiration.
Between October 2013 to June 2015, 36 ischemic stroke patients with dysphagia were included. Patients were enrolled according to stroke criteria defined by the World Health Organization based on magnetic resonance imaging. Underlying diseases and past history of patients were reviewed. Patients were included at least one of the following criteria; when they have (1) clinical symptoms of dysphagia, such as coughing, chocking, or drooling, (2) clinical signs such as wet breath and gurgling sound while eating or drinking, lack of tongue movement, gag reflex, and laryngeal elevation or vocal cord paralysis, or (3) patients were considered for removal of the feeding tube after an acute period of stroke. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) active cardiac, respiratory, and other severe medical conditions, (2) hyperacute stroke, (3) transient ischemic attack, (4) prior or current structural lesions causing oropharyngeal dysphagia, and (5) other neurologic disorders causing oropharyngeal dysphagia, such as Parkinsonism, dementia, and neuromuscular diseases. The study protocol was approved by the Sungkyunkwan University Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from each participant.
A solid-state manometric assembly with 36 circumferential sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals (4.2 mm outer diameter) was used (Given Imaging, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Before the recording, transducers were calibrated at 0 and 300 mmHg using externally applied pressure. After a brief interview and examination to ensure the absence of gastrointestinal symptoms and to perform anthropometric measurements, subjects underwent transnasal placement of the manometric assembly. Studies were done in a comfortable sitting position after at least an 8-hour fast. 2% lidocaine was sprayed into the nasal cavity of the opposite side of the paralysis. The manometric catheter was inserted into the anesthetized nasal canal, positioned to record from the mesopharynx to the UES, and was fixed in place by taping it to the nose. The manometric protocol included a 5-minute period to assess basal sphincter pressure and five swallows of 5 mL water. The swallows were excluded if there were extreme delay responses of pharyngeal contraction after the swallow initiation or dry swallows without 5 mL of water.
This study was performed with the patient seated in a chair. Patients swallowed 5 mL of water twice. The lateral view of swallowing was recorded with C-arm (ZEN-2060; Genoray Co, Seongnam, Korea). A blinded rehabilitation physician analyzed the VFSS findings, which consisted of vallecular residue, pyriform sinus residue and aspiration by the method used in the earlier study.12 Vallecular and pyriform sinus residues were graded as follows: grade 0, no residue; grade 1, less than 10% of height of vallecula or pyriform sinus in VFSS imaging; grade 2, from 10% to 50%; grade 3, above 50%; and defined as absent (grade 0) or present (grade 1, 2, and 3). Penetration was defined as: the residue reaches but does not pass through the glottis. Aspiration was defined as follows: (1) visible residue below glottis reversed by reflex coughing, (2) small amount of residue through the main airway, but not detected on chest X-ray, or (3) large amount of residue through the main airway and detected on chest X-ray.
Manometry data analysis was performed by the method used in a previous study (Fig. 1).11 In summary, manometric data were analyzed using MATLAB (MathWorks; Natick, MA, USA). Six important metrics of HRM were chosen for comparison between swallows including: (1) basal pressure of the UES, (2) mesopharyngeal contractile integral (mesopharyngeal CI, mmHg · sec · cm), (3) CI of the hypopharynx and UES (hypopharyngeal CI), (4) relaxation interval of the UES (seconds), and (5) median intrabolus pressure, and (6) nadir pressure of the UES during deglutition. Basal pressure of the UES was defined as the mean UES pressure calculated as the average of the inspiratory and expiratory values.13 Mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal CIs were calculated by amplitude × duration × length (mmHg · sec · cm) of muscular contraction ≥ 70 mmHg. Relaxation interval was defined as the duration of time from onset at the point of departure from half the baseline to the offset at the return to half baseline pressure.14 Median intrabolus pressure was the median pressure recorded during the relaxation interval. Nadir pressure was minimum UES pressure attained during relaxation.15
All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). We used the mean values of HRM to evaluate the relationship with findings of VFSS. Comparisons of metrics between participants with normal and abnormal VFSS findings were made by the Student’s
Of the 36 ischemic stroke patients (22 males and 14 females), 19 had a supratentorial lesion, 13 had an infratentorial lesion, and 4 had both supratentorial and infratentorial lesions. The mean age was 67.5 ± 14.2 years. Twenty-two (61.1%) patients were oral feeders and 14 (38.9%) patients had feeding tubes. Twelve (33.3%) patients had a history of aspiration pneumonia. Eleven (78.6%) of 14 tube-fed patients had feeding tubes for unconscious acute stroke, 2 (14.3%) patients had experienced recurrent aspiration pneumonia during a feeding tube, and 1 patient (7.1%) had a feeding tube for dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia after oral feeding. Study was performed within 1 to 6 months from the stroke attack.
On VFSS, the severity of pyriform sinus or vallecula residues was almost the same in all 5 swallows in a patient and consistent with repeat tests. Also, pharyngeal contractility and relaxation time of UES were consistent between the 5 swallows of the same patient. Three (8.3%) patients and 4 (11.1%) patients had pyriform sinus residues and vallecular sinus residues, respectively. Also, 8 (22.2%) patients, 11 (30.6%) patients, and 5 (13.8%) patients showed vallecular overflow, penetration, and aspiration, respectively (Fig. 2).
On analysis of the association between pharyngeal contractility and residue, mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal CIs in patients with residue in the pyriform sinus were significantly lower than those in patients without residue in the pyriform sinus (
Figure 4 shows the results of analysis of the relationship between relaxation time intervals of the UES and abnormal finding of VFSS; aspiration. Relaxation time intervals of the UES in patients with aspiration were significantly shorter than those in patients without aspiration (0.24 ± 0.20 seconds and 0.52 ± 0.11 seconds, respectively;
In this study, we demonstrated that residues remaining in the pyriform sinus on VFSS were the result of decreased mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractility, and the occurrences of aspiration were significantly associated with shortened relaxation time interval of the UES. In addition, median intrabolus pressure and nadir pressure of the UES in patients with aspiration were significantly higher than those in patients without aspiration.
Weak mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal contractility were the important causes of residue in the pyriform sinus in this study. These results were consistent with those of earlier studies which showed that patients with dysphagia had weak pharyngeal contractions and high UES residual pressures in manometry,8 and presence of bolus residue in the pyriform sinus was significantly associated with lower peak amplitude of pressure wave at the sensor in the hypopharynx.16 Although other manometric metrics were also suggested to be related to the occurrence of residue in the pyriform sinus, including high UES resting pressure, pharyngeal spasm, and incoordination between UES relaxation and pharyngeal contraction, those metrics were not associated with pyriform sinus residue in this study. However, UES resting pressure was negatively associated with relaxation time interval (
Contrary to our expectations, lower mesopharyngeal contractility was not related to the development of vallecular residues. Bolus propulsion through the pharynx is a combination of posterior tongue thrust and sequential caudally oriented contraction of the pharyngeal constrictors.2 Therefore, residue might remain in the vallecula when there is insufficient contact between base of the tongue and the posterior pharyngeal wall. One possible explanation is that viscosity is another important factor for the development of vallecular residue. In fact, our preliminary study demonstrated that residue remained in the vallecula when patients with lower mesopharyngeal contractility swallowed thicker food, such as yogurt. A second possible explanation is that a specific part of the mesopharynx (such as the base of the tongue or posterior mesopharyngeal wall), instead of total mesopharyngeal contractility, is more responsible for the presence of vallecular residue. In this study, mesopharyngeal CI was the only indicator of contractility by the tongue base and mesopharyngeal wall, and this method could not verify which part of the mesopharynx is more responsible for the decreased mesopharyngeal contractility. More sophisticated methods to evaluate pharyngeal muscle incoordination should be explored in the future.
One interesting finding of this study was the significant correlation between mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal CI in patients with dysphagia (
Until recently, there were few reports that demonstrated the relationship between UES relaxation and the risk of aspiration. Higher flow interval was a better marker of the presence of aspiration18 and combination of pressure flow variables and swallow risk index is a robust predictor of aspiration. In our study, patients with aspiration had a more profound decrease in relaxation time interval and a significant increase in median intrabolus pressure and nadir pressure compared to patients without aspiration.19 Most patients with shorter relaxation time interval of UES had the delay in opening of the UES (based on the results of HRM). If pharyngeal contents are pushed toward the upper esophagus before the UES is opened, aspiration could occur due to large amount of remnant food. Actually, a delay in cricopharyngeal opening of more than one-third of a second is associated pulmonary aspiration.20
Taken together, impaired UES relaxation is responsible for the development of aspiration, and these findings were in line with previous studies that showed the beneficial effect of dilatation of UES; Modified balloon dilatation improved UES relaxation duration, residual pressure, pharyngeal contraction, and oral intake in stroke patients with dysphagia.21 Similarly, botulinum toxin injection improved dysfunction of UES opening and aspiration.22 These results suggested that UES relaxation time interval and relaxation pressure might play a role in predicting aspiration.
Limitations of our study were as follows: first, manometric catheter can only be placed in the lateral side of the UES opening. This can cause selection bias in measuring the functional status of the pharynx and UES. Hence, the catheter should be located in the weak side of the body especially in the evaluation of hemiplegias. Second, we used 2-dimensional image of pressure topography for analyzing the results. However, real food bolus passes through the 3- dimensional space of the pharynx and this makes it very difficult to estimate the pharyngeal contractile function properly. Third, we did not evaluate and classify the symptom severity of dysphagia. In this study, all patients had dysphagia, but only a portion of patients had abnormal VFSS. VFSS can be affected by abnormality of the contractility of the oropharyngeal muscle and UES opening. Further study is required to evaluate the correlation between VFSS, HRM, and severity of dysphagia symptoms. Fourth, there were small numbers of abnormal samples. The clinical importance of this study is to assess the parameter for predicting aspiration pneumonia as a fatal complication in stroke patients. This study is in progress on a larger case series and on the basis of these results, a new study is ongoing in the application of botulinum toxin injection for these patients, which can reduce the risk of aspiration and improve the quality of life.
In conclusion, manometric measurements of the pharynx and UES were well correlated with abnormal findings in VFSS, and a shorter relaxation time interval of the UES during deglutition is an important parameter for the development of aspiration.
Multivariate Analysis of the Risk for Aspiration by Relaxation Time Interval, Intrabolus Pressure, and Nadir Pressure
|Median intrabolus pressureb||1.09||0.86–1.38||0.467|
|Relaxation time interval||0.03||0.01–0.65||0.027|
aNadir pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) during deglutition.
bMedian intrabolus pressure of the UES during deglutition.